VTH LAW GROUP PLLC is a litigation-focused law firm representing clients in high-stakes disputes, adversarial proceedings, and complex legal conflicts. The firm is retained when matters escalate, positions harden, and outcomes materially impact business, liberty, or reputation. VTH Law provides strategic counsel and courtroom advocacy to individuals, executives, and organizations facing significant legal, financial, and regulatory exposure.
Debt Financing
Equity Raises
Financial Restructuring
Asset Recovery
Domestic Transactions
Cross-Border Transactions
Government Interaction
VTH Law has represented the global interests of clients in both the private and public sectors, advising and litigating matters that cross borders, jurisdictions, and legal systems. The firm is experienced in coordinating strategy across multiple venues, working with local counsel where required, and navigating the legal, regulatory, and political realities of international disputes.
This is typically done telephonically and allows us to gain a basic understanding of the Client’s issue. We gather information as needed to perform conflict checks and vet the Prospective Client’s matter against our capabilities to assist. Prospective Clients should be aware and take comfort knowing that attorney-client privilege regarding their matter attaches at this point, even if we are never formally engaged. There is never a charge for the Initial Consultation.
After the Initial Consultation, we take what we have learned from the Prospective Client and perform a check for any potential or actual conflicts of interest. If we feel we have a conflict of interest that would prohibit us from taking on the Prospective Client, we will immediately inform them in writing.
If no conflicts exist, we move into our initial vetting phase. Here we examine the basic legal framework of the matter and confer with relevant experts to determine a confidence level in our ability to successfully resolve the Prospective Client’s matter. We then report that confidence level to the Prospective Client with the understanding that we cannot and will not ever make any promises regarding final outcomes.
At this point, if the Prospective Client wishes to continue with us, we present them with a menu of options reflecting our capabilities to assist with their matter, along with a recommended course of action. Most options presented are accompanied with a fixed cost and timeframe, giving the Prospective Client control over how much money and time they chose to spend to resolve their matter. Where fixed costs cannot readily be given, we always strive to provide realistic estimates of both cost and time.
Once the Prospective Client choses their course action, that course of action is reduced into a written engagement agreement outlining the scope of work to be performed, identifying milestones relevant to resolution of the matter, and the obligations of the now Client and our Firm.
The outset of any Engagement with a new Client typically involves more intensive consultations and information gathering in line with the nature and scope of the Engagement. The Client should expect a lot of back-and-forth communication as well as requests from us for additional information. The effectiveness of this stage of our process is vital to successful outcomes.
Throughout the Performance phase, we update the Client immediately of all important developments or decisions that need to be made. Of course, we are always available should the Client have any questions.
When we have resolution options available, we immediately present them to the Client and open a dialogue about concluding the matter versus further courses of action. With our advice in hand, the Client then makes necessary decisions. At that point, the Engagement will either continue with next objectives identified, or conclude.
The firm concentrates on commercial litigation, contract and business disputes, regulatory enforcement response, fraud-related matters, fiduciary breaches, and pre-litigation escalation, with an emphasis on leverage, precision, and results. VTH Law approaches each engagement with a clear objective: to protect its clients’ interests aggressively, efficiently, and without unnecessary compromise.
VTH Law is known for its disciplined legal strategy, rigorous factual development, and willingness to pursue all lawful remedies when informal resolution fails. The firm regularly advises clients prior to filing suit, during active litigation, and through resolution or trial, ensuring that risk is controlled and pressure is applied where it is most effective.
Representative regions and jurisdictions where VTH Law has worked include:
Africa · Egypt · Ghana · Kenya · Libya · Mauritius · South Africa · Sudan · Tunisia · Zimbabwe · Asia & the Middle East · Afghanistan · Azerbaijan · Bahrain · China · Hong Kong · India · Iraq · Israel · Japan · Jordan · Kazakhstan · Kuwait · Lebanon · Malaysia · Myanmar · Philippines · Qatar · Saudi Arabia · Singapore · South Korea · Sri Lanka · Thailand · Taiwan · Turkmenistan · Vietnam · United Arab Emirates · Europe · Albania · Austria · Belgium · Bosnia · Bulgaria · Croatia · France · Georgia · Germany · Greece · Ireland · Italy · Luxembourg · Malta · Monaco · Netherlands · Poland · Romania · Russia · Serbia · Slovenia · Spain · Sweden · Switzerland · Turkey · Ukraine · United Kingdom · North & Central America · Canada · Costa Rica · Cuba · Dominican Republic · Mexico · Panama · Puerto Rico · United States · Oceania · Australia · New Zealand · South America · Argentina · Brazil · Colombia · Ecuador · Peru
VTH Law is known for its disciplined legal strategy, rigorous factual development, and willingness to pursue all lawful remedies when informal resolution fails. The firm regularly advises clients prior to filing suit, during active litigation, and through resolution or trial, ensuring that risk is controlled and pressure is applied where it is most effective.
Education
Juris Doctorate May 2005
Arizona State University
Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering September 2002
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering June 2001
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Licensed
State of Arizona, 2005
District of Columbia, 2007
U.S. Federal Court, District of Arizona, 2005
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 2006
United States Supreme Court, 2009
Bar Admission
LIC AZ 2005 / TX 2022 / WDC 2007 / DIS. AZ 2006 / 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Western United States / North District of Texas / Eastern District of Texas / 5th Circuit court of appeals / United States Supreme Court
Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice. Attorney-client relationships are formed only through a written engagement agreement. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
© Copyright 2026 VTH LAW GROUP - All Rights Reserved